Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

The Non-Identity of the Neurohumors for the Melanophores and the Xanthophores of Fundulus

Authors: A. A. Abramowitz;

The Non-Identity of the Neurohumors for the Melanophores and the Xanthophores of Fundulus

Abstract

IT has been shown that the reactions of the xanthophores (yellow pigment cells) in Fundulus heteroclitus are independent of the responses of the melanophoresblack pigment cells (Connolly, 1925; Fries, 1931). For example, both the xanthophores and the melanlophores are contracted in a fish which has been kept for some time in an illuminated white vessel, and both are expanded in one kept in an illuminated black vessel. In an animal adapted to a blue background, however, the melanophores are mainly expanded and the xanthophores contracted, while on a yellow background, the xanthophores are expanded and the melanophores are contracted. Thus this inclependent behavior of the yellow and black pigment cells to yellow and blue backgrounds led Fries to conclude that the two types of chromatophores were controlled by separate sets of neurons. In the following year, Parker (1932) formulated the neurohumoral hypothesis for the control of chromatophores on the basis of the responses of denervated melanophores. Such responses were first clearly described by Fries (1931), who declared that they must be governed by humoral substances. Mills (1932), who studied in detail the same responses, concluded also that humoral factors were responsible for the activity of enervated melanophores and stated further that these humoral substances were secretions from intact nerve terminals surrounding 1 These experiments were performed at the Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, during the summers of 1934 and 1935. For the privilege of working at the laboratory in 1935, I am especially indebted to its director, Dr. M. H. Jacobs.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    5
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
5
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!