
doi: 10.1086/210089
L'A. examine le role du recit et de la theorie generale dans l'elaboration de l'explication en sociologie historique. Il analyse, de facon critique, la theorie d'Edgar Kiser et de Michael Hechter en ce domaine. Il denonce le role des theories generales mis en exergue par Kiser et Hechter. Il qualifie d'inductivisme la perspective defendue par ces derniers. Il etudie la fonction du recit dans l'epistemologie historique. Il etudie ce que recouvre la notion de causalite au sein des sciences historiques.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 71 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
