Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Laterally-positioned placenta in placenta previa

Authors: Hironori Takahashi; Yosuke Baba; Rie Usui; Hirotada Suzuki; Akihide Ohkuchi; Shigeki Matsubara;

Laterally-positioned placenta in placenta previa

Abstract

Objectives: To clarify perinatal outcomes of patients with placenta previa (PP) with the placenta mainly positioned in the lateral uterine wall (lateral PP), thereby clinically characterizing this condition.Study design: The retrospective cohort study was performed involving patients with lateral PP between January 2006 and December 2016. The placental position was determined and classified by magnetic resonance imaging.Results: This study included 98 patients with PP, which was classified into three types according to the main placental position sites: lateral (n = 30), anterior (n = 32), and posterior (n = 36) PP. Overall, the median blood loss at cesarean section (CS) was 1808 mL and transfusion was performed for 78 patients (80%). Univariate analysis showed that patients with lateral PP bled less at CS than those with non-lateral PP (anterior + posterior PP) [median 1510 (interquartile range 1080-2168) versus 1975 (1570-2860) mL: p=.02]. The other parameters including rates of conception by assisted reproductive technology, prior CS, antepartum bleeding, and placenta accreta spectrum did not show the significances. Among the three groups of PP (lateral versus anterior versus posterior), patients with lateral PP bled less than those with anterior (p=.05) or posterior (p=.13) PP, but this was nonsignificant [lateral 1510 (1080-2168) versus anterior 2145 (1580-3348) versus posterior 1808 (1533-2555) mL]. When dividing into lateral PP to two types: placenta showing anterior dominancy versus posterior dominancy, patients with lateral PP and anterior dominancy bled more those with posterior dominancy [2430 (1410-3400) versus 1170 (1050-1588) mL: p=.002].Conclusion: Patients with lateral PP bled significantly less than those with non-lateral (anterior or posterior) PP. Patients with lateral PP and anterior dominancy bled more than those with posterior dominancy.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Cesarean Section, Pregnancy, Placenta, Placenta Previa, Humans, Female, Placenta Accreta, Retrospective Studies

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    7
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
7
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!