Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Seminars in Breast D...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Seminars in Breast Disease
Article . 2004 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy

Authors: Ian E. Smith;

Neoadjuvant Endocrine Therapy

Abstract

The modern era of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was developed with tamoxifen in the 1980s. Trials showed useful downstaging to avoid mastectomy, but long term results showed that this could be used before but not instead of surgery. Recently neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitors have been shown to be superior to tamoxifen. Letrozole was significantly superior in terms of clinical response (55% vs. 36%) and breast conservation (45% vs. 35%). Neoadjuvant anastrozole has also been shown to be significantly superior in terms of breast conservation in the combined results from 2 trials, IMPACT and PROACT (43% vs. 31%) although a significant reduction in clinical response was not seen in the IMPACT trial. Both aromatase inhibitors have a particular gain over tamoxifen in tumours which over-express HER2. Data have emerged from the IMPACT trial suggesting that the changes in short term biological parameters such as Ki67 may predict for long term outcome in major adjuvant trials.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!