Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Ultrasound in Obstet...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Article . 2000 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Intra‐ and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurement

Authors: Eva Pajkrt; Patrick M.M. Bossuyt; A.P. Drogtrop; C. M. Bilardo; K. Boer; Ben W.J. Mol;

Intra‐ and interoperator repeatability of the nuchal translucency measurement

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to assess the repeatability of nuchal translucency measurement by well‐trained sonographers either experienced or inexperienced with the measurement.MethodsThe nuchal translucency was measured three times by two out of nine operators in 161 pregnant women attending two teaching hospitals. Intra‐operator and inter‐operator variation was assessed by calculating the standard deviation (SD). Intraclass Correlation Coefficients (ICC) with a 95% lower confidence limit (95% CL) were calculated for each operator and for pairs of operators. Intra‐and inter‐operator kappa statistics were calculated, after dichotomising the results into a nuchal translucency smaller or larger than 3 mm.ResultsThe SD of intra‐operator difference was 0.35 mm. The intra‐operator repeatability showed ICCs varying from 0.83 to 0.95 for the experienced operators and from 0.47 to 0.83 for the inexperienced. The SD of inter‐operator differences was 0.56 mm, 0.46 mm and 0.44 mm, based on one, two and three measurements, respectively. The inter‐operator repeatability showed a variation in ICC from 0.74 to 0.95 in pairs of experienced sonographers to 0.51 in one pair inexperienced with the measurement. The kappa value expressing the intra and inter‐operator repeatability as being > 3 mm or < 3 mm was 0.88 and 0.85, respectively.ConclusionThis study supports the finding that the nuchal translucency measurement is reproducible, as long as it is performed by sonographers well trained in the technique of this measurement. Copyright © 2000 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Related Organizations
Keywords

Observer Variation, Pregnancy, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Female, Down Syndrome, Neck, Ultrasonography, Prenatal

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    39
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
39
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author? Do you have the OA version of this publication?