
doi: 10.1038/nrn2919
Nature Reviews Neuroscience 11, 417–428 (2010) On page 419 of the above article, references 12 and 13 in the bottom table of Box 1 should have been, respectively, references 42 (Lamm, C. et al. PLoS ONE 2, e1292 (2007)) and 43 (Morrison, I. et al. Neuroimage 37, 642–651 (2007)).
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
