
<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>doi: 10.1038/nature12660
pmid: 24256805
arising from C.-C. Chen et al. , 74–77 (2013)10.1038/nature12009 At first sight, the achievement of determining atom positions in three dimensions appears spectacular1. Chen and colleagues1 apply a form of tomographic reconstruction to a tilt series of annular dark field (ADF) images of crystalline particles with defects, where the original data has a filter applied to reduce noise. However, the filtering imposes periodicities and significantly downgrades resolution, and the condition of signal linearity—a requirement for tomography—has not been met. We consider that their procedure gives an illusion of locating atom positions accurately. There is a Reply to this Brief Communication Arising by Miao, J. et al. Nature503,http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12661(2013) .
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
