
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.95
pmid: 27245210
handle: 20.500.14243/358075 , 11577/3193180 , 11392/2475473
doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2016.95
pmid: 27245210
handle: 20.500.14243/358075 , 11577/3193180 , 11392/2475473
Prospective studies have suggested that hypovitaminosis D can predict the onset of obesity, but they relied mainly on body mass index, which could be scarcely reliable in older people. We investigated whether baseline hypovitaminosis D could predict higher fat mass (FM) levels using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a sample of 116 fit and healthy older subjects. Although no significant differences in FM estimates emerged between subjects with and without hypovitaminosis D at the baseline, abdominal FM was found significantly higher in the former group (with hypovitaminosis D at the baseline) than in the latter after 3 years of follow-up. Adjusted logistic regression analysis confirmed these findings: hypovitaminosis D coincided with an approximately sixfold higher risk of subjects having higher abdominal FM levels at the follow-up. In conclusion, hypovitaminosis D predicts higher abdominal FM levels in the elderly.
Male, Nutrition and Dietetics, Abdominal Fat, Medicine (miscellaneous), Middle Aged, Vitamin D Deficiency, Body Mass Index, Medicine (miscellaneous); Nutrition and Dietetics, Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Vitamin-D Deficiency; Obesity; Women; Metaanalysis; Adiposity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cross-Sectional Studies, Obesity, Abdominal, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Vitamin D, Follow-Up Studies
Male, Nutrition and Dietetics, Abdominal Fat, Medicine (miscellaneous), Middle Aged, Vitamin D Deficiency, Body Mass Index, Medicine (miscellaneous); Nutrition and Dietetics, Serum 25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Vitamin-D Deficiency; Obesity; Women; Metaanalysis; Adiposity, Absorptiometry, Photon, Cross-Sectional Studies, Obesity, Abdominal, Body Composition, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, Vitamin D, Follow-Up Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 2 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
