
doi: 10.1038/121496b0
I CAN only adhere to my original views as to atomic diameters. Prof. Eddington tries to challenge my position by arguments based on “the usual gas model.” By this I think he means his own gas model, which is of a very special and restricted type, and by no means characteristic of the general gaseous configurations of a star. I believe his difficulties arise solely from the defects of his own model.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
