
Abstract We introduce new types of examples of bounded degree acyclic Borel graphs and study their combinatorial properties in the context of descriptive combinatorics, using a generalization of the determinacy method of Marks [Mar16]. The motivation for the construction comes from the adaptation of this method to the $\mathsf {LOCAL}$ model of distributed computing [BCG+21]. Our approach unifies the previous results in the area, as well as produces new ones. In particular, strengthening the main result of [TV21], we show that for $\Delta>2$ , it is impossible to give a simple characterization of acyclic $\Delta $ -regular Borel graphs with Borel chromatic number at most $\Delta $ : such graphs form a $\mathbf {\Sigma }^1_2$ -complete set. This implies a strong failure of Brooks-like theorems in the Borel context.
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Classes of sets (Borel fields, \(\sigma\)-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets, Mathematics - Logic, 05C15, Coloring of graphs and hypergraphs, Computer Science - Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing, 03E15, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC), Combinatorics (math.CO), Logic (math.LO), Descriptive set theory, 28A05, Mathematics
FOS: Computer and information sciences, Classes of sets (Borel fields, \(\sigma\)-rings, etc.), measurable sets, Suslin sets, analytic sets, Mathematics - Logic, 05C15, Coloring of graphs and hypergraphs, Computer Science - Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing, 03E15, QA1-939, FOS: Mathematics, Mathematics - Combinatorics, Distributed, Parallel, and Cluster Computing (cs.DC), Combinatorics (math.CO), Logic (math.LO), Descriptive set theory, 28A05, Mathematics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
