Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ The Journal of the A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
The Journal of the American Association of Gynecologic Laparoscopists
Article . 1999 . Peer-reviewed
License: CC BY NC ND
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

Mouse laparoscopy

Authors: E, Hirsch; T, Otto; R, Blanchard; J O, Rosenberg;

Mouse laparoscopy

Abstract

To develop a technique for performing laparoscopy in the mouse.Controlled animal study (Canadian Task Force classification II-1).University research laboratory.Twenty-eight CD-1 pregnant mice.Eight mice underwent anesthesia only and 20 had anesthesia plus laparoscopy at 5.5 and at 10.5 days' gestation (implantation occurs on day 4.5 and delivery on days 19-20).Four mice in the laparoscopy group died early in the series, three due to hemorrhage and one due to anesthetic overdose. Among survivors, there were no differences between operated and control groups in number of pups delivered at term (8.7 +/- 5.1 and 8.9 +/- 3.8, respectively), frequency of pregnancy failure (18.8% and 12.5%), and presence of intraabdominal adhesions on autopsy after delivery (12. 5% and 12.5%). Intraabdominal contents could be manipulated to visualize both uterine horns in their entirety. The number of gestations could be counted accurately as early as 1 day after implantation.Given the fact that laparoscopy is not accompanied by the immunosuppression characteristic of laparotomy, this technique could prove useful for investigations requiring intraabdominal manipulations in mice when preservation of immune function is critical. The technique can be performed safely and repeatedly after an initial learning period. (J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 6(2):173-177, 1999)

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mice, Pregnancy, Reference Values, Animals, Pregnancy, Animal, Female, Laparoscopy, Mice, Inbred Strains, Sensitivity and Specificity

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
hybrid
Related to Research communities