
pmid: 5117352
Summary In summary, we feel that the total replacement knee joint prosthesis deserves a permanent place in the armamentarium of the reconstructive surgeon. Instability due to combined femoral and tibial articular destruction is the indication for the procedure. A predictable result may be anticipated so long as the patient has the required anatomic assets. A proposed change in surgical technique should increase the yield of successful operations. Failure can be retrieved by means of athrodesis. Total replacement of the knee joint utilizing a prosthesis is not a procedure to be utilized instead of joint debridement, femoral prosthetic replacement, or tibial prosthetic replacement. Its place is in reconstruction of the knee whose articular integrity is so compromised that partial replacement cannot solve the problem. The only alternative procedure is therefore arthrodesis.
Postoperative Care, Knee Joint, Joint Prosthesis, Arthrodesis, Arthroplasty, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Knee, Joint Diseases
Postoperative Care, Knee Joint, Joint Prosthesis, Arthrodesis, Arthroplasty, Radiography, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Knee, Joint Diseases
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
