
Abstract This paper provides an explanation for aspects of the behaviour of the English modal auxiliaries based at the syntax–semantics interface. The core idea is a marriage of Kratzer's [Linguistics and Philosophy, 1 (1977), 337] classical analysis of modals as propositional operators with current minimalist ideas about the propositional nature of phases [Chomsky (1999) MITOPL, 18]. This gives rise to two scope positions for modals: one associated with the vP phase, and one with the CP phase. It is shown that the former scope position leads to root readings of modals and the latter to epistemic readings.
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 97 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
