
There is ongoing debate regarding the robustness and credibility of published scientific research. We argue that these issues stem from two broad causal mechanisms: the cognitive biases of researchers and the incentive structures within which researchers operate. The UK Reproducibility Network (UKRN) is working with researchers, institutions, funders, publishers, and other stakeholders to address these issues.
330, Publications, replication crisis, Reproducibility of Results, Research Personnel, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, name=Cognitive Science, UK Reproducibility Network, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, Humans
330, Publications, replication crisis, Reproducibility of Results, Research Personnel, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science, name=Cognitive Science, UK Reproducibility Network, /dk/atira/pure/core/keywords/cognitive_science; name=Cognitive Science, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 42 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
