
AbstractOptimisation of the rowing technique is of paramount importance in improving performance and minimising injury risks. This report aims to investigate and compare arm kinematics between two commonly used commercial gymnasium rowing ergometers; five female amateur rowers were tested on the Concept2™ and the RowPerfect™. Qualisys™ (Sweden) motion analysis system was used to measure stroke kinematics. Results indicate that subjects on the Concept2™ tended to ‘jerk’ (impulse load) the handle during the rowing stroke in an attempt to achieve greater power. Arm kinematics indicate that the RowPerfect™ appears to be more effective for recreational users compared to the Concept2™.
RowPerfect, Concept2, Rowing, Upper limbs, Female rowing stroke, Ergometer, Engineering(all)
RowPerfect, Concept2, Rowing, Upper limbs, Female rowing stroke, Ergometer, Engineering(all)
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 7 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
