
AbstractDesigners formulate requirements to ensure development processes that anticipate stakeholder needs. Most development projects fail due to vague and imprecisely formulated requirements, which is linked to poor requirement quality in the early phases of development projects.This paper presents the newly developed REQ Method to systematically support designers during the formulation of requirements, according to important quality criteria. The paper offers a critically reflected assessment scheme for documented requirements to assess requirement quality. The methodological support builds a valuable base for better requirement quality, reducing the risk of trade-offs and project termination.
methodological support, requirement quality, quality criteria, standardized requirements, requirements
methodological support, requirement quality, quality criteria, standardized requirements, requirements
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
