
To quantify and compare portosystemic pressure gradients (PSGs) between bleeding esophageal varices (EV) and gastric varices (GV).In a single-center, retrospective study, 149 patients with variceal bleeding (90 men, 59 women, mean age 52 y) with EV (n = 69; 46%) or GV (n = 80; 54%) were selected from 320 consecutive patients who underwent successful transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation from 1998 to 2016. GV were subcategorized using the Sarin classification as gastroesophageal varices (GEV) (n = 57) or isolated gastric varices (IGV) (n = 23). PSG before TIPS was measured from the main portal vein to the right atrium. PSGs were compared across EV, GEV, and IGV groups using 1-way analysis of variance.Overall mean baseline PSG was 21 mm Hg ± 6. PSG was significantly higher in patients with EV versus GV (23 mm Hg vs 19 mm Hg; P < .001). Mean PSG was highest among EV (23 mm Hg) with lower PSGs identified for GEV (20 mm Hg) and IGV (16 mm Hg); this difference was statistically significant (P < .001). Among 95 acute bleeding cases, a similar pattern was evident (EV 23 mm Hg vs GEV mm Hg 20 vs IGV 17 mm Hg; P < .001). At baseline PSG < 12 mm Hg, 13% (3/23) of IGV bled versus 9% (5/57) of GEV and 3% (2/69) of EVs (P = .169). Mean final PSG after TIPS was 8 mm Hg (IGV 6 mm Hg vs EV and GEV 8 mm Hg; P = .005).GV bleed at lower PSGs than EV. EV, GEV, and IGV bleeding is associated with successively lower PSGs. These findings highlight distinct physiology, anatomy, and behavior of GV compared with EV.
Male, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Radiography, Interventional, Retrospective Studies
Male, Humans, Female, Middle Aged, Portasystemic Shunt, Transjugular Intrahepatic, Esophageal and Gastric Varices, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Radiography, Interventional, Retrospective Studies
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 40 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
