Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao The Journal of Urolo...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
The Journal of Urology
Article . 2012 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

This Research product is the result of merged Research products in OpenAIRE.

You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.

1529 OPENING THE INGUINAL CANAL IS UNNECESSARY IN INGUINAL ORCHIOPEXY

Authors: Frank J. Penna; Mireya Diaz; Jack S. Elder;

1529 OPENING THE INGUINAL CANAL IS UNNECESSARY IN INGUINAL ORCHIOPEXY

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: In boys with an inguinal testis, the traditional approach is to perform an inguinal incision, open the inguinal canal, mobilize the testis and spermatic cord, repair the inguinal hernia if present, and place the testis in a dartos pouch in the scrotum. In boys, the inguinal canal is short and during inguinal hernia repair, it is often unnecessary to extend the dissection to the internal inguinal ring in order to mobilize enough length. The purpose of this study is to determine if performing a modified inguinal orchiopexy (without opening the inguinal canal) results in a successful orchiopexy. METHODS: Boys with an inguinal testis who underwent orchiopexy were reviewed retrospectively. Patient age and surgical approach (inguinal, with or without inguinal dissection, or prescrotal) were recorded. Only if the testis did not reach the dartos pouch was the inguinal canal opened and a standard orchiopexy performed with inguinal dissection. Presence of an inguinal hernia was also noted. All patients underwent clinical follow-up at 4-6 weeks. Boys with an ectopic, abdominal or absent testis and those undergoing previous inguinal surgery were excluded. RESULTS: A total of 254 boys with 323 undescended inguinal testes were reviewed. The results are shown in Table 1. Overall, 171 underwent a modified inguinal orchiopexy without opening the inguinal canal, 36 underwent inguinal orchiopexy with standard inguinal dissection, and 116 underwent prescrotal orchiopexy. A total of 123 (38.1%) testes were associated with an inguinal hernia that was repaired during orchiopexy. Of those with a hernia, 92 underwent a modified inguinal orchiopexy, 23 underwent a standard inguinal orchiopexy, and 9 were corrected via a prescrotal approach. There was one complication of testicular re-ascent in the modified inguinal orchiopexy group. CONCLUSIONS: In boys with an inguinal undescended testis, orchiopexy can be performed without opening the inguinal canal, even if there is an associated inguinal hernia, with the decision being dependent upon the ability to mobilize the testis and spermatic cord into the dartos pouch. Inguinal (M) Inguinal (S) Prescrotal Total No. testis 171 36 116 323 Mean age (yrs.) 5.1 5.9 4.9 5.1 Hernia 92 (54%) 23 (64%) 9 (8%) 123 (38%) No. side Lt 79 20 56 155 Rt 92 16 60 168 No. complications 1 (0.5%) 0 (0%) 0 (0%) 1 (0.3%) (M) modified, (S) standard

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    citations
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
citations
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Related to Research communities
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!