
Struvite (NH4MgPO4·6H2O) is a slow-release phosphorus (P) fertilizer hypothesized to reduce nutrient leaching losses relative to highly water-soluble counterparts such as monoammonium phosphate (MAP). We assessed the leaching fate of P from struvite relative to MAP using soil column experiments for two soils representative of the United States Maize Belt, an Arguidoll and a Fragiudalf. Inorganic P and N in leachate (49.8 pore volumes (vp)) were directly quantified for synthesized 33P-labeled struvite and 33P-labeled MAP directly and indirectly by omission method (i.e., by difference with a P-unfertilized treatment). By 8.3 vp, less than 0.02 % of struvite-P was leached in the Fragiudalf according to both methods of determination, compared to 11.1 % MAP-P determined directly by 33P tracing and 14.1 % of MAP-P by the omission method. Fertilizer-P leached quantified directly by 33P labeling was on average 1.2- to 3.7-fold lower than by indirectly by omission for both fertilizers at 2.8–13.9 vp across both soils, indicating consistent overestimation in P leaching by the commonly used omission method. Leaching of struvite-N was an order of magnitude lower than MAP-N in the Fragiudalf after 8.3 vp. Struvite entailed 17.4 %–20.4 % lower P leaching and 22.1–46 % lower N leaching compared to MAP across soils under simulated extreme precipitation events, supporting the hypothesized ability of struvite to reduce P as well as N leaching relative to more water-soluble ammonium phosphate fertilizers such as MAP. Additionally, our results point to a methodological need to validate fertilizer P leaching estimated by the commonly used omission method using direct quantification by radioisotopic labeling.
Soil column, Science, vp, Q, Pore volume, Omission method, Nutrient losses, Radiolabeling
Soil column, Science, vp, Q, Pore volume, Omission method, Nutrient losses, Radiolabeling
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
