Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Physica Medicaarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Physica Medica
Article . 2016 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 1 versions
addClaim

O13. A comparison of TPS commissioning dosimeters

Authors: L. Koen; W. Shaw;

O13. A comparison of TPS commissioning dosimeters

Abstract

Introduction The quality of treatment planning system (TPS) commissioning data largely determines the quality of the derived TPS beam model. Modern treatment techniques require a very high degree of competence from the dosimetrist, as well as the dosimetry equipment used for TPS commissioning. Once derived, the beam model should be verified with a range of tests other than commissioning procedures to test the beam model against linac output. Generally, dosimeters used for TPS beam data collection differ largely from those used for post-modelling verification measurements; therefore their correlation needs to be investigated. Materials and Methods Reference beam profile commissioning data were acquired with a Diamond detector (PTW-60019) for field sizes 2 × 2, 3 × 3 and 5 × 5 cm2 at depths 5 and 10 cm in water. Measurements were repeated with a 2D diode array (SunNuclear Mapcheck2) and compared to reference data. Default array spatial resolution of 1 cm was optimized to 1 mm by manual stepping of the device; therefore only measured (non-interpolated) data was gathered and collated using Excel VBA. A 2D gamma analysis with criteria 1%/1 mm was used for quantitative comparisons. Results Comparison of datasets revealed γ 1 in the open and penumbra regions for all scans evaluated. Mapcheck generally yielded a sharper penumbra (0.5 mm) while the largest differences were seen outside the field with Mapcheck demonstrating a 1.5% larger relative dose. Such small deviations can be attributed to differences in the detector sensitive volumes and dosimeter setup. Further, reducing the amount of steps per array profile by two-thirds (from 10 step increments to 3) did not influence the results significantly. Conclusion Results showed with increased resolution the sensitivity of the array are comparable to a diamond detector for small field profiles. Excellent overall agreement was found between these. However, the dosimetric accomplishment may be weakened by acquisition and processing workload therefore optimization thereof was demonstrated.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!