
pmid: 33756135
In the last ten years, the next generation sequencing revolution has multiplied the amount of genetic data for many organisms by orders of magnitude. This has not only led to evolutionary biologists having more data available but also to new and different types of data: from a handful of allozyme markers in the 70s, we got dozens of restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) in the 80s, hundreds of microsatellites in the 90s, thousands to hundreds of thousands of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the 2000s, a few full genomes in the 2010s, and thousands of full genomes in the 2020s. These data have provided information not only on the genetic diversity and evolution of the organisms studied but also on genome-wide patterns of selection, linkage disequilibrium, as well as recombination and mutation processes. Below, we will describe how these new genomic data can be used to infer the past demographic history of populations.
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Genome, Models, Genetic, Animals, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Genomics, Linkage Disequilibrium, Demography
[SDV] Life Sciences [q-bio], Genome, Models, Genetic, Animals, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing, Humans, Genomics, Linkage Disequilibrium, Demography
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 48 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
