
pmid: 19361732
Technological advances have attempted to improve the standard of traditional x-ray imaging. ImageIQ software (LumenIQ, Bellingham, Wash) enhances conventional radiography by producing a computer-generated, enhanced 2-dimensional (2D) image, adding depth and detail. The software converts the scales of gray to topographic height values, which are easier for the eye to see. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the enhanced 2D renderings are as sensitive as traditional 2D radiographs for detecting periodontal defects in cadaver mandibles.Periodontal defects were located and classified on 20 cadaver mandibles. These defects were radiographed, and computer-generated, enhanced 2D topographic renderings were made with ImageIQ software. A panel of evaluators was shown the 2D radiographs and the enhanced 2D renderings in random order. The evaluators classified the defects from these images.Significantly better agreement by the evaluators with the intrasurgical classification was found with the enhanced 2D rendering to view periodontal defects vs the traditional 2D x-ray. Enhanced 2D renderings improved the accuracy of radiographic periodontal defect classification by 14.3% over traditional 2D radiographs.Computer generated, enhanced 2D renderings of conventional radiographs might provide a reliable diagnostic alternative to conventional 2D radiographs when attempting to classify periodontal defects.
Radiographic Image Enhancement, Analysis of Variance, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Cadaver, Radiography, Dental, Humans, Mandible, Periodontal Diseases
Radiographic Image Enhancement, Analysis of Variance, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Cadaver, Radiography, Dental, Humans, Mandible, Periodontal Diseases
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
