
doi: 10.1007/bf00632472
handle: 11245/1.424420
Some aspects of the theory of generalized quantifiers related to linguistics are considered. Syntactically, generalized polyadic quantifiers appear in expressions \(Qx_ 1...x_ n\cdot \phi (x_ 1,...,x_ n)\); this is interpreted set-theoretically as \(\| \phi \| \in Q\). The main goal of the paper is to discuss the role of polyadic quantification and to compare it with more traditional unary quantification. Some linguistic examples of polyadic quantifiers are given. Then some classes of quantifiers are introduced, such as logical (invariant under permutations of individuals), oriented, scopeless, monotone quantifiers etc. Special attention is payed to ``Fregean'' quantifiers which can be reduced to iterations of unary quantifiers. A lot of recent (and some new) results connecting different types of quantifiers are presented. For example, on a finite domain a binary quantifier is definable by a Boolean combination of iterations of logical unary quantifiers iff it is logical and right-oriented.
Logic with extra quantifiers and operators, categorial grammar, generalized quantifiers, linguistics, lambda calculus, unary quantifiers, Formal languages and automata, General logic, iterations of quantifiers, Logic of natural languages, Combinatory logic and lambda calculus, polyadic quantifiers
Logic with extra quantifiers and operators, categorial grammar, generalized quantifiers, linguistics, lambda calculus, unary quantifiers, Formal languages and automata, General logic, iterations of quantifiers, Logic of natural languages, Combinatory logic and lambda calculus, polyadic quantifiers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 74 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
