Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Theoretical and Appl...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Theoretical and Applied Genetics
Article . 1993 . Peer-reviewed
License: Springer TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize

Authors: R, Bernardo;

Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize

Abstract

The coefficient of coancestry (fAB) between individuals A and B is the classical measure of genetic relationship. fAB is determined from pedigree records and is the probability that random alleles at the same locus in A and B are copies of the same ancestral allele or identical by descent (ibd). Recently, the proportion of molecular marker variants shared between A and B (SAB) has been used to measure genetic relationship. But SAB is an upwardly-biased estimator of fAB, especially between distantly-related lines. fAB, SAB, and adjusted (to remove bias) estimates of molecular marker similarity (f AB (M) ) were compared. RFLP banding patterns at 46 probe-restriction enzyme combinations were obtained for 23 maize inbred lines derived from the Iowa Stiff Stalk Synthetic (BSSS) maize (Zea mays L.) population, and for 4 non-BSSS lines. f AB (M) was estimated as [Formula: see text], where δ A (or δ B) was the average proportion of RFLP variants shared between inbred A (or inbred B) and the non-BSSS lines. The average fAB among 253 pairwise combinations of BSSS lines was 0.212, whereas the average SAB was 0.397. The average f AB (M) was 0.162, indicating that the upward bias in SAB was effectively removed. SAB and fAB were significantly different (α = 0.05) in 76.3% of the comparisons, whereas 24.9% of the f AB (M) values differed significantly from fAB. The latter result suggests that selection and/or drift were present during inbred line development and that fAB may not be an accurate measure of the true proportion of ibd alleles between two lines. Cluster analyses based on S AB (M) and f AB (M) grouped lines according to pedigree, although several exceptions were noted. The presence of shared molecular marker variants between unrelated lines must be considered when setting SAB-based minimum distances for varietal protection. Under simplified conditions, more than 250 molecular marker loci are necessary to obtain sufficiently precise estimates of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers.

Related Organizations
  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    75
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
75
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!