Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Regulatory Toxicolog...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Article . 1998 . Peer-reviewed
License: Elsevier TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 3 versions
addClaim

Safety Assessment of Lactate Esters

Authors: Clary, J.J.; Feron, V.J.; Velthuijsen, J.A. van;

Safety Assessment of Lactate Esters

Abstract

Lactate esters have an oral LD50 greater than 2000 mg/kg and the inhalation LC50 is generally above 5000 mg/m3 and they may be potential eye and skin irritants, but not skin sensitizers. No evidence of teratogenicity or maternal toxicity was observed in an inhalation (2-ethylhexyl-l-lactate) or dermal study (ethyl-l-lactate). Subacute inhalation studies have been conducted at concentration up to 600 mg/m3 or higher on four lactate esters (ethyl, n-butyl, isobutyl, and 2-ethylhexyl-l-lactate). Degenerative and regenerative changes in the nasal cavity were noted in all studies. The NOAEL in ethyl, n-butyl, and isobutyl-l-lactate vapor studies was 200 mg/m3. For aerosol exposure, 2-ethylhexyl-l-lactate, the most toxic of the lactates, minimal damage to the nasal epithelium was noted at 75 mg/m3 with vapor being slightly less toxic than the aerosol. Lactates do not appear to cause systemic toxicity, except at very high concentrations (1800 mg/m3 or higher). These systemic effects may be secondary to severe irritation seen at high doses. Sensory irritation tests suggest that a vapor exposure limit of 75 mg/m3 ( approximately 15 ppm) should prevent irritation in humans and therefore an occupational exposure level for vapor of 75 mg/m3 is recommended. However, aerosol exposure should be kept as low as possible. The low vapor pressure of the higher molecular weight esters would tend to keep vapor exposure low and the odor of lactate esters serves as a warning of exposure. These lactate esters are readily biodegradable, suggesting little concern from an environmental point of view.

Country
Netherlands
Related Organizations
Keywords

Male, Unclassified drug, Mouse, Lactic acid propyl ester, Administration, Oral, Lactic acid methyl ester, Review, Lactic acid isobutyl ester, Odor, Eye irritation, Inhalational drug administration, Priority journal, Risk assessment, Netherlands, Esters, Normal human, Inhalation, Human experiment, Irritants, Lactates, Female, Nasal Cavity, Human, Lactic acid butyl ester, Lactic acid isodecyl ester, Sensitization, Lethal Dose 50, Structure-Activity Relationship, Mucosa inflammation, Oral drug administration, Dose response, Administration, Inhalation, Animalia, Animals, Animal experiment, Lactic acid 2 ethylhexyl ester, Aerosol, Food additive, No-Observed-Adverse-Effect Level, Mutagenicity Tests, Lactic acid derivative, Nonhuman, Lactic acid benzyl ester, Rats, Lactic acid ethyl ester, Lactic acid isopropyl ester, Solvents, Rat, Topical drug administration, Nose mucosa

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    83
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
83
Top 10%
Top 10%
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!