
doi: 10.1002/sim.6557
pmid: 26084662
In multiple myeloma research, the GEP70 model is known to be capable of predicting a high risk patient group for disease progression based on the expression levels of 70 selected genes measured at baseline. The model consists of a continuous gene score that is a linear combination of the 70 genes along with a cutoff, such that patients with a score greater than the cutoff are categorized as high risk and otherwise low risk for disease progression. However, the continuous gene score may be confusing at times because of its open range nature. In addition, the present two‐group model is sensitive to scores falling close to its cutoff. To facilitate patients' understanding of their prognosis, it is desirable to convert the continuous score into a probability that has an easier interpretation. In this article, we employ a latent class model to address this issue, and we also propose a superior grey zone model to refine the current risk stratification associated with the GEP70 model. Lastly, we demonstrate the robustness of the grey zone model with results from a simulation study. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Clinical Trials as Topic, Arkansas, Models, Statistical, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Disease Progression, Humans, Computer Simulation, Multiple Myeloma, Algorithms, Probability, Proportional Hazards Models
Clinical Trials as Topic, Arkansas, Models, Statistical, Risk Assessment, Disease-Free Survival, Disease Progression, Humans, Computer Simulation, Multiple Myeloma, Algorithms, Probability, Proportional Hazards Models
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 4 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
