
doi: 10.1002/jso.21282
pmid: 19466743
AbstractCancer pathology reports contain information which is critical for patient management and for cancer surveillance, resource planning, and quality purposes. The College of American Pathologists (CAP) has defined scientifically validated content of checklists that form the basis for synoptic cancer pathology reporting. We outline how the CAP standards were implemented in a large Canadian province over a 3‐year period resulting in improvements in rates of synoptic reporting and completeness of cancer pathology reporting. J. Surg. Oncol. 2009;99:517–524. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Ontario, Medical Audit, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Pathology, Surgical, Reference Standards, User-Computer Interface, Vocabulary, Controlled, Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
Ontario, Medical Audit, Medical Records Systems, Computerized, Pathology, Surgical, Reference Standards, User-Computer Interface, Vocabulary, Controlled, Neoplasms, Population Surveillance, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Humans
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 180 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
