
AbstractBACKGROUNDThe high ureolytic activity of rumen microbiota is a concern when urea is used in ruminant feed, because it leads to fast urea conversion, resulting in possible intoxication and lower nitrogen utilization. This study intended to microencapsulate urea using carnauba wax to obtain slow‐release systems in the rumen. The experiment was conducted in a randomized block design, arranged in a 3 × 2 factorial, with the urea encapsulated with carnauba wax in ratios of 1 : 2; 1 : 3, and 1 : 4 (UME2; UME3, and UME4) and two particles sizes (small, PS; and large, PL).RESULTSAll formulations showed excellent properties, including inhibition of urea hygroscopicity. The formulation UME2 exhibited the greatest yield (91.6%) and microencapsulation efficiency (99.6%) values, whereas the formulation UME4 presented the greatest thermal stability (259.5 °C) and lowest moisture content (1.81%). The UME2 formulation presented a slower release than the other UME formulations studied.CONCLUSIONThe production of urea microspheres using carnauba wax was successful for all microencapsulated systems developed, evidencing the promising potential for use in ruminant animal diets. The UME2 formulation with large particles is the most recommended because it permitted greater resistance to microbial attack, allowing a slower release of urea into the rumen, reducing the risk of intoxication or ruminal alkalosis. © 2018 Society of Chemical Industry
Male, slow-release system, Rumen, 660, Drug Compounding, Copernicia prunifera, urea, Animal Feed, Diet, animal nutrition, Waxes, Animals, Urea, Sheep, Domestic
Male, slow-release system, Rumen, 660, Drug Compounding, Copernicia prunifera, urea, Animal Feed, Diet, animal nutrition, Waxes, Animals, Urea, Sheep, Domestic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 27 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
