
doi: 10.1002/jclp.22771
pmid: 30859581
AbstractObjectiveTo scope the literature describing misophonia populations, management, and research opportunities.MethodLiterature searches for research studies describing patients diagnosed with misophonia, defining a patient profile, or outlining development or testing of an intervention for misophonia. A data extraction form was developed and piloted before data from each article were independently charted by two researchers. Researchers then agreed on a final data set for each article.ResultsThirty‐one records were included. The misophonia population was described in terms of onset age, triggers, reaction, coping strategies, and comorbid conditions. We identified nine outcome measures. Case studies on treatments included cognitive behavioral therapy, counterconditioning, mindfulness and acceptance, dialectical behavioral therapy, and pharmaceuticals. Future research priorities identified included clarifying the phenomenology and prevalence of misophonia, and randomized controlled trials of treatments.ConclusionMisophonia is under‐researched but there are strong foundations for future research to finalize diagnostic criteria, validate outcome measures, and trial treatments.
Psychotherapy, Hyperacusis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Outcome measures, Research priorities
Psychotherapy, Hyperacusis, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Diagnosis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Prevalence, Humans, Female, Outcome measures, Research priorities
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 84 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
