
pmid: 33773082
AbstractWithin this work, we demonstrate the influences of different microgrooved surface topographies on the alignment and spreading of human gingival fibroblast (HGF) cells and present the optimal parameters for an improved soft‐tissue integration design for dental implant abutments for the first time. Microgrooves with lateral widths from 2.5 to 75 μm were fabricated by UV‐lithography and wet etching on bulk Ti6Al4V ELI material. The microstructured surfaces were compared to polished and ground surfaces as current state of the art. The resulting microtopographies were analyzed using vertical scanning interferometry and scanning electron microscopy. Samples loaded with HGF cells were incubated for 8 and 72 hr and cell orientation, spreading, resulting area, and relative gene expression were analyzed. The effect of contact guidance occurred on all microstructured surfaces yet there is a clear preferable range for the lateral widths of the microgrooves between approx. 11.5 and 13.9 μm and depths between 1.6 and 2.4 μm for an abutment surface design, where cell orientation and spreading maximizes. For structures larger than 30 μm, cell orientation, spreading and even gene expression of intercellular adhesion molecule‐1 and yes‐associated protein decrease.
ddc:620, Dental Implants, Titanium, Gingiva, Ti6Al4V, 610, UV-lithograp, Fibroblasts, 620, contact guidance, Materials Testing, Alloys, Cell Adhesion, human gingival fibroblasts, Humans, Engineering & allied operations, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620, microgrooves, Cell Proliferation
ddc:620, Dental Implants, Titanium, Gingiva, Ti6Al4V, 610, UV-lithograp, Fibroblasts, 620, contact guidance, Materials Testing, Alloys, Cell Adhesion, human gingival fibroblasts, Humans, Engineering & allied operations, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/620, microgrooves, Cell Proliferation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
