
doi: 10.1002/ajim.21027
pmid: 22069039
AbstractBackgroundTo evaluate a consistent association between jobs in “electric” occupations and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), a comprehensive job exposure matrix (JEM) that includes electric shocks and magnetic fields (MF) is needed.MethodsWe used incident electric shocks and electrocutions from two available data sources along with expert judgment to create a JEM that was integrated into an existing MF JEM. The final JEM contained ordinal electric‐shock exposure assignments for 501 job titles.ResultsMain occupational groups experiencing the electric shocks were precision production, craft, and repair occupations. Specific jobs with the highest proportion of shocks per 100,000 workers were: electrical apprentices (99.7), mechanic and repairer helpers (74.0), hoist and winch operators (63.3), and electrical power installers (52.4). Examples of job titles with low electric‐shock exposures were administrative support occupations, data‐key entry operators, and waiters and waitresses.ConclusionsCombining publicly available data with an expert panel is a viable method to construct an electric‐shock MF JEM. This JEM will allow an evaluation of association between electric shocks and neurodegenerative diseases. Am. J. Ind. Med. 55:232–240, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Electric Injuries, Magnetic Fields, Electricity, Occupational Exposure, Humans, Occupations, United States
Electric Injuries, Magnetic Fields, Electricity, Occupational Exposure, Humans, Occupations, United States
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
