
doi: 10.1002/acs.2582
handle: 2108/198823
SummarySeveral continuous‐time frequency estimators for a measured sinusoidal signal, which have been proposed in the literature, are reviewed, reinterpreted and compared both theoretically and by simulations. It is argued that adaptive notch filters are feedback algorithms that contain a local adaptive observer in the feedback loop. It is shown that the adaptive notch filter (ANF), which was originally conceived as a discrete‐time ANF, is basically equivalent to the recently proposed adapted frequency locked loop called orthogonal signal generator. They both require a sufficiently slow frequency estimation and can be interpreted as third‐order adaptive observers. They exhibit local convergence properties for the estimation errors, that is, the convergence to zero is guaranteed provided that their initial error is sufficiently small. Three adaptive observers, which were independently proposed in 2002, are third‐order frequency estimators whose estimation errors are exponentially convergent to zero from any initial condition and for any value of frequency, amplitude and phase in the measured sinusoidal signal. They have the additional advantage of not requiring the frequency estimation dynamics to be sufficiently slow. Conversely, they may be interpreted as adaptive notch filters. Second‐order frequency estimators have been proposed as well: they may be interpreted as adaptive reduced‐order observers. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
notch filter, adaptive observer, Observability, Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Adaptive control/observation systems, disturbance rejection, frequency estimation, Settore ING-INF/04 - AUTOMATICA, Filtering in stochastic control theory
notch filter, adaptive observer, Observability, Estimation and detection in stochastic control theory, Adaptive control/observation systems, disturbance rejection, frequency estimation, Settore ING-INF/04 - AUTOMATICA, Filtering in stochastic control theory
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 17 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
