
pmid: 8703402
I read the article by Dohar et al 1 with interest. Their finding concerning the efficacy of piperacillin and tobramycin against aural isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa is consistent with the sensitivity data at our institution in Honolulu, Hawaii (piperacillin, 97%; tobramycin, 100%). In Hawaii, otitis externa caused by Pseudomonas is common because of tropical weather and frequency of year-round water sports. From 1993 to 1995, we found that several additional antibiotics were at least as effective as piperacillin for aural isolates of Pseudomonas : ceftazidime (100%), imipenem (100%), and aztreonam (98%). These antibiotics are approved for children and are especially useful in patients who are allergic to penicillin. These antibiotics can be given by intramuscular or intravenous injection, and, because of their longer half-lives, can be given at 8- to 12-hour intervals. Therefore, ceftazidime, imipenem, and aztreonam are more amenable than piperacillin for outpatient antibiotic therapy of serious Pseudomonas ear infections,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Humans, Pseudomonas Infections, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Otitis Externa
Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Humans, Pseudomonas Infections, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Otitis Externa
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
