publication . Preprint . 2017


Condon , David; Revelle , William;
Open Access
  • Published: 13 Dec 2017
  • Publisher: Center for Open Science
<p>Separating the signal in a test from the irrelevant noise is a challenge for all measurement. Low test reliability limits test validity, attenuates important relationships, and can lead to regression artifacts. Multiple approaches to the assessment and improvement of reliability are discussed. The advantages and disadvantages of several different approaches to reliability are considered. Practical advice on how to assess reliability using open source software is provided.</p>
free text keywords: bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences, bepress|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Psychology|Quantitative Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Computational Modeling, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Experimental Design and Sample Surveys, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Mathematical Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Psychometrics, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Quantitative Psychology, PsyArXiv|Social and Behavioral Sciences|Quantitative Methods|Statistical Methods
83 references, page 1 of 6

Allport, G. W., & Odbert, H. S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (211). [OpenAIRE]

Atkinson, G., Waterhouse, J., Reilly, T., & Edwards, B. (2001). How to show that unicorn milk is a chronobiotic: The regression-to-the mean statistical artifact. Chronobiology International: The Journal of Biological & Medical Rhythm Research, 18 (6), 1041-1053.

Bentler, P. (2009). Alpha, dimension-free, and model-based internal consistency reliability. Psychometrika, 74 (1), 137-143. doi: 10.1007/s11336-008-9100-1

Bock, R. D. (1997). A brief history of item theory response. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16 (4), 21{33. Retrieved from doi: 10 .1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00605.x

Brennan, R. L. (1997). A perspective on the history of generabability theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 16 (4), 14{20. Retrieved from .1997.tb00604.x doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3992.1997.tb00604.x

Brennan, R. L., & Kane, M. T. (1977). Signal/noise ratios for domain referenced tests. Psychometrika, 42 (4), 609-625.

Brown, W. (1910). Some experimental results in the correlation of mental abilities. British Journal of Psychology, 3 (3), 296-322. [OpenAIRE]

Campbell, D. T., & Kenny, D. (1999). A primer on regression artifacts. Guilford Press.

Cicero, M. T. (1877). Tusculan disputations (translated by C.D. Yonge, Ed.). New York: Harper & Brothers (Originally published c 45 BCE).

Cole, D. A., Martin, N. C., & Steiger, J. H. (2005). Empirical and conceptual problems with longitudinal trait-state models: Introducing a trait-state-occasion model. Psychological Methods, 10 (1), 3{20.

Condon, D. M., & Revelle, W. (2014). The International Cognitive Ability Resource: Development and initial validation of a public-domain measure. Intelligence, (in press). [OpenAIRE]

Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coe cient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16 , 297-334.

Cronbach, L. J., & Gleser, G. C. (1964). The signal/noise ratio in the comparison of reliability coe cients. Educational and Psychological Measurement , 24 (3), 467-480.

Cronbach, L. J., Gleser, G. C., Nanda, H., & Rajaratnam, N. (1972). The dependability of behavioral measurements: Theory of generalizability for scores and pro les. New York: Wiley.

Cronbach, L. J., Rajaratnam, N., & Gleser, G. C. (1963). Theory of generalizability: A liberalization of reliability theory. British Journal of Statistical Psychology , 41 , 137-163.

83 references, page 1 of 6
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue