Could the IMS Infrasound Stations Support a Global Network of Small Aperture Seismic Arrays?

Preprint OPEN
Mykkeltveit, Svein ; Kværna, Tormod ; Gibbons, Steven (2017)
  • Related identifiers: doi: 10.31223/OSF.IO/G9K5S, doi: 10.17605/OSF.IO/G9K5S
  • Subject: EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences | bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences | EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics | EarthArXiv|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geophysics and Seismology | bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics | bepress|Physical Sciences and Mathematics|Earth Sciences|Geophysics and Seismology

The IMS infrasound arrays have up to 15 sites with apertures up to 3 km. They are distributed remarkably uniformly over the globe, providing excellent coverage of South America, Africa, and Antarctica. Therefore, many infrasound arrays are in regions thousands of kilometers from the closest seismic array. Existing 3-component seismic stations, co-located with infrasound arrays, show how typical seismic signals look at these locations. We estimate a theoretical array response assuming a seismometer at each infrasound sensor, although the true performance would depend upon both SNR and coherence. These properties can however only be determined experimentally and borehole deployments may be needed to record seismic data of sufficient quality. We demonstrate, from a purely geometrical perspective, that essentially all IMS infrasound array configurations would provide seismic arrays with acceptable slowness resolution. Such arrays in many regions would likely enhance significantly the seismic monitoring capability in parts of the world where only 3-component stations are currently available. Co-locating seismic and infrasound sensors would mitigate the development and operational costs due to shared infrastructure, and hosting countries might find such added capabilities valuable from a national perspective. The seismic data may allow far more information to be gleaned from the infrasound data. (Note that SRL papers at the time did not have abstracts. The above abstract was for a presentation with the same name held at the CTBTO Science and Technology Conference 2015.)
  • References (30)
    30 references, page 1 of 3

    Ammon, C. J., T. Lay, and D. W. Simpson (2010), Great Earthquakes and Global Seismic Networks, Seismological Research Letters, 81, 965-971, doi:10.1785/gssrl.81.6.965

    Braun, T. and J. Schweitzer (2008), Spatial Noise-Field Characteristics of a Three-Component Small Aperture Test Array in Central Italy, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 98, 1876- 1886, doi:10.1785/0120070077

    Brown, D. J., C. N. Katz, R. Le Bras, M. P. Flanagan, J. Wang, and A. K. Gault (2002). Infrasonic Signal Detection and Source Location at the Prototype International Data Centre, Pure and Applied Geophysics, 159, 1081-1125, doi:10.1007/s00024-002-8674-2

    Büßelberg, T., C. Müller, and A. Eckstaller (2001), The Neumayer Array and Its Impact on Seismological Research in the South Atlantic and Antarctica, Terra Antartica 8, 41-48

    Christie, D. R., and P. Campus (2010). The IMS Infrasound Network: Design and Establishment of Infrasound Stations, Chapter 2 in “Infrasound Monitoring for Atmospheric Studies”, Le Pichon, A., Blanc, E., and Hauchecorne, A. (eds.), Springer Science and Business Media, B. V, 29-75. doi:10.1007/978-1-4020-9508-5_2

    Clinton, J. F., M. Nettles, F. Walter, K. Anderson, T. Dahl-Jensen, D. Giardini, A. Govoni, W. Hanka, S. Lasocki, W. S. Lee, David McCormack, S. Mykkeltveit, E. Stutzmann, and S. Tsuboi (2014), Seismic Network in Greenland Monitors Earth and Ice System, EOS Transactions, AGU, 95, 13- 14, doi:10.1002/2014eo020001

    Dahlman, O., S. Mykkeltveit, H. Haak (2009), Nuclear Test Ban: Converting Political Visions to Reality, Springer Science+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht, The Netherlands ISBN: 978-1-4020-6883-6 (Print) 978-1-4020-6885-0 (Online) 10.1007/978-1-4020-6885-0

    Dahlman, O., J. Mackby, S. Mykkeltveit, H. Haak (2011), Detect and Deter: Can Countries Verify the Nuclear Test Ban? Springer Science+Business Media B.V, Dordrecht, The Netherlands. ISBN: 978-94-007-1675-9 (Print) 978-94-007-1676-6 (Online) doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1676-6

    Douglas, A. (2002), Seismometer Arrays - Their Use in Earthquake and Test Ban Seismology, in “International Handbook of Earthquake and Engineering Seismology”, ed.s Lee, W. H. K., Kanamori, H., Jennings, P. C., and Kisslinger, C., Academic Press, 357-367. doi:10.1016/s0074- 6142(02)80226-1

    Gal, M., Reading, A. M., Ellingsen, S. P., Koper, K. D., Gibbons, S. J., and Näsholm, S. P. (2014), Improved implementation of the fk and Capon methods for array analysis of seismic noise, Geophysical Journal International 198, 1045-1054, doi:10.1093/gji/ggu183

  • Metrics
    views in OpenAIRE
    views in local repository
    downloads in local repository
Share - Bookmark

  • Download from
    EarthArXiv via EarthArXiv (Preprint, 2017)
  • Cite this publication