
It has been proven that the formation of a modern land and property complex management system requires the development and implementation of land use directions at the regional level, which are based on the paradigm of sustainable development of territories. Increasing the efficiency of land use depends on the tools and mechanisms for organizing the development of territories. Unfortunately, in recent years, land development at the regional level has been slowing down, which is due to the influence of a complex of factors: disruption of regional ties, the consequences of the aggression of the Russian Federation, a decrease in the efficiency of land use and stakeholder interaction, a decrease in the possibilities of their use, the destruction of the land and property complex, a decrease in the investment attractiveness of lands, especially in front-line regions.It is proposed to define the development of territories as a qualitatively new state, which is ensured by the permanent growth of functional, spatial, urban planning, environmental, investment and innovation, stakeholder, and security factors to increase the socio-economic level and well-being of the population of the regions. To ensure the development of territories, an organizational and spatial mechanism for ensuring the territorial development of land use in regions is used, which is determined by a set of organizational and spatial components, the interaction of which is carried out on the basis of the typological structure of territorial development factors and the formed quantitative basis for the development of development scenarios.Organizational support for the development of territories is formed on the basis of stakeholder relations, interaction between organizational structures. In the system for forming organizational support for modeling the processes of territorial development of land use, geoinformation systems are used.As a result of the study, a mediocre level of ensuring the territorial development of land use in most regions was established. At an insignificant level, territorial development processes are determined in front-line regions or in regions with significant aggressive influence: Zaporizhia, Mykolaiv, Odessa, Sumy, Kharkiv, Kherson, Chernihiv. A low level of territorial development of land use was characterized by regions where hostilities are underway and most of the territories are occupied: Donetsk and Luhansk.
Доведено, що формування сучасної системи управління земельно-майновим комплексом потребує розроблення та реалізації напрямів використання земель на регіональному рівні, базованих на парадигмі сталого розвитку територій. Підвищення ефективності землекористування залежить від інструментарію та механізмів організації розвитку територій. На жаль, за останні роки відбувається гальмування розвитку земель на регіональному рівні, що обумовлено впливом комплексу чинників: порушення регіональних зв’язків, наслідки агресії РФ, зниження ефективності використання земель і взаємодії стейкхолдерів, зниження можливостей їх використання, руйнування земельно-майнового комплексу, зниження інвестиційної привабливості земель, особливо у прифронтових регіонах.
territorial development, regional land use, organization of territorial development, assessment, organizational and spatial mechanism, stakeholders, geographic information systems, територіальний розвиток, використання земель регіонів, організація розвитку територій, оцінка, організаційно-просторовий механізм, стейкхолдери, геоінформаційні системи
territorial development, regional land use, organization of territorial development, assessment, organizational and spatial mechanism, stakeholders, geographic information systems, територіальний розвиток, використання земель регіонів, організація розвитку територій, оцінка, організаційно-просторовий механізм, стейкхолдери, геоінформаційні системи
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
