The article considers the current problems that arise during the qualification "Concealment of a crime" (Article 397 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine), in particular on the basis of the subjective side. The problem of the correct qualification of a criminal offense depends on the correct establishment of all the features of the criminal offense, among which the greatest complexity are the features of the subjective side. To do this, it is necessary to disclose the content and characteristics of the subjective side, its mandatory features, and to determine the significance of the characteristics of the subjective side of the crime for the criminal assessment of the offense. The subjective side is a mandatory element of any criminal offense. Among its features are guilt, motive and purpose of the criminal offense. The analysis of judicial practice, scientific works gives the chance to develop scientific knowledge concerning the outlined question and to draw the following conclusions. The subjective side of concealment of a crime (Article 396 of the Criminal Code of Ukraine) is characterized by guilt exclusively in the form of direct intent. The qualification of concealment of a crime can be significantly affected by a person's legal or factual error. Motive and purpose are optional features of the composition of concealment of the crime, they do not affect the qualification of the perpetrator, but must be considered by the court in sentencing. At the same time, the selfish motive of concealment of a crime has a great social danger, but fixing it in the tort under investigation is considered inexpedient, as it may complicate the distinction between concealment of a crime committed for selfish motives and acquisition, receipt, storage or sale of criminally obtained property. The significance of the subjective side and its features for qualification is determined. The paper reveals the features of subjective signs of concealment of a crime on the basis of the provisions of the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Examples from judicial practice are analyzed.

В статье рассматриваются актуальные проблемы, возникающие при квалификации «Укрывательства преступления» (ст. 396 УК Украины), в частности, по признаку субъективной стороны. Определено значение субъективной стороны и ее признаков для квалификации. В работе раскрыты особенности субъективных признаков укрывательства преступления на основании положений УК Украины. Анализируются примеры судебной практики.

У статті розглядаються актуальні проблеми, що виникають під час кваліфікації «Приховування злочину» (ст. 397 КК України), зокрема за ознакою суб'єктивної сторони. Визначене значення суб’єктивної сторони та її ознак для кваліфікації. У роботі розкрито особливості суб’єктивних ознак приховування злочину на підставі положень КК України. Аналізуються приклади з судової практики.