
The purpose of this article is a detailed analysis of the rating evaluation of the scientific and pedagogical staff (SPS) at the Hetman Petro Sahaidachnyi National Academy of Ground Forces for the period from September to December 2024. The study focuses on identifying the dynamics of changes in rating indicators, determining the key factors influencing the formation of ratings, and analyzing the advantages and challenges of the implemented evaluation system. The research methodology includes an analysis of statistical data obtained during the rating evaluation, a comparative analysis of results among faculties and departments, and an assessment of the influence of specific components (teaching, methodological, scientific, and organizational activities) on the overall rating. Special attention is paid to the objectivity and transparency of the evaluation, ensuring that the criteria align with modern educational needs, and the system’s impact on the strategic development of the academy. The article presents the algorithm for calculating rating scores and examines the dynamics of changes over four months. The main results show increased competition among departments and heightened motivation of the SPS to improve their professional activities. Educators with high ratings were more actively involved in implementing innovative teaching approaches, improving educational programs, and initiating scientific projects. However, the analysis also revealed certain issues, including the need to improve evaluation methodology, enhance technical support, and eliminate potential subjective factors during assessments. The need for a unified electronic platform to automate the evaluation process and introduce additional incentives to maintain staff motivation has been identified. The article offers recommendations for optimizing the rating system, including adapting the criteria to the specifics of military education, refining calculation methods, and developing tools to ensure evaluation transparency. The scientific significance of the study lies in creating an effective model of rating evaluation that can be implemented in other military and civilian educational institutions. The practical value of the article is in improving the quality of educational activities, motivating the teaching staff, and supporting the professional development of the SPS.
У статті проаналізовано результати рейтингового оцінювання діяльності науково- педагогічних працівників Національної академії сухопутних військ за вересень-грудень 2024 року. Досліджено динаміку змін рейтингових показників, визначено ключові фактори впливу та обґрунтовано напрями вдосконалення системи оцінювання. Виявлено переваги та недоліки методики, розглянуто перспективи автоматизації процесу. Запропоновано рекомендації для підвищення об’єктивності та прозорості рейтингової системи.
рейтингове оцінювання; науково-педагогічні працівники; динаміка змін; мотивація; якість освіти; професійний розвиток; прозорість оцінювання; військова освіта., rating evaluation; scientific and pedagogical staff; dynamics of changes; motivation; quality of education; professional development; evaluation transparency; military education.
рейтингове оцінювання; науково-педагогічні працівники; динаміка змін; мотивація; якість освіти; професійний розвиток; прозорість оцінювання; військова освіта., rating evaluation; scientific and pedagogical staff; dynamics of changes; motivation; quality of education; professional development; evaluation transparency; military education.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
