Benefits of greenhouse gas mitigation on the supply, management, and use of water resources in the United States

Article English OPEN
Strzepek, Kenneth ; Neumann, J. ; SMith, J. ; Martinich, J. ; Boehlert, B. ; Hejazi, M. ; Henderson, J. ; Wobus, C. ; Jones, R. ; Calvin, K. ; Johnson, D. ; Monier, Erwan ; Strzepek, J. ; Yoon, J.-H. (2013)

Climate change impacts on water resources in the United States are likely to be far-reaching and substantial because the water is integral to climate, and the water sector spans many parts of the economy. This paper estimates impacts and damages from five water resource-related models addressing runoff, drought risk, economics of water supply/demand, water stress, and flooding damages. The models differ in the water system assessed, spatial scale, and unit of assessment, but together provide a quantitative and descriptive richness in characterizing water sector effects that no single model can capture. The results, driven by a consistent set of greenhouse gas (GHG) emission and climate scenarios, examine uncertainty from emissions, climate sensitivity, and climate model selection. While calculating the net impact of climate change on the water sector as a whole may be impractical, broad conclusions can be drawn regarding patterns of change and benefits of GHG mitigation. Four key findings emerge: 1) GHG mitigation substantially reduces hydro-climatic impacts on the water sector; 2) GHG mitigation provides substantial national economic benefits in water resources related sectors; 3) the models show a strong signal of wetting for the Eastern US and a strong signal of drying in the Southwest; and 4) unmanaged hydrologic systems impacts show strong correlation with the change in magnitude and direction of precipitation and temperature from climate models, but managed water resource systems and regional economic systems show lower correlation with changes in climate variables due to non-linearities created by water infrastructure and the socio-economic changes in non-climate driven water demand.
  • References (37)
    37 references, page 1 of 4

    Boehlert, B, Strzepek, K. and Solomon, S. (2014) “Uncertainty in GCM projections for global and US water resources” MIT Joint Program Report Series, In Preparation

    Booker JF (1995) Hydrologic and economic impacts of drought under alternative policy responses. Water Resour Bull 31:889-906

    Choi O, Fisher A (2003) The impacts of socioeconomic development and climate change on severe weather catastrophe losses: Mid-Atlantic region and the US. Clim Chang 58:149-170

    Clarke L, Lurz J, Wise M et al (2007) Model documentation for the MiniCAM climate change science program stabilization scenarios. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland

    Council on Environmental Quality (2013) Principles and Requirements for Federal Investments in Water Resources. Washington, DC. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ceq/initiatives/PandG

    Davies E, Kyle P, Edmonds JA (2013) An integrated assessment of global and regional water demands for electricity generation to 2095. Adv Water Resour 52:296-313. doi:10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.11.020

    Edmonds J, Reilly J (1985) Global energy: assessing the future. Oxford University Press, New York

    Environmental Protection Agency (2013) Watershed modeling to assess the sensitivity of streamflow, nutrient, and sediment loads to potential climate change and urban development in 20 U.S. watersheds. National Center for Environmental Assessment, EPA/600/R-12/058A

    Gonzalez J, Valdes J (2006) New drought frequency index: definition and comparative performance analysis. Water Resour Res 42:W11421

    Hejazi M, Edmonds J, Clarke L et al (2014a) Integrated assessment of global water scarcity over the 21st century under multiple climate change mitigation policies. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 18:2859-2883. doi:10.5194/hess18-2859-2014

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark