publication . Preprint . 2016

Interpreting the Recent Upper Limit on the Gravitational Wave Background from the Parkes Pulsar Timing Array

The NANOGrav Collaboration;
Open Access English
  • Published: 19 Feb 2016
Comment: 2 pages
arXiv: Astrophysics::High Energy Astrophysical PhenomenaComputer Science::Digital Libraries
free text keywords: Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies, General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology
Download from

2. A. Sesana, Insights into the astrophysics of supermassive black hole binaries from pulsar timing observations. Classical Quant. Grav. 30, 224014 (2013), arXiv:1307.2600 [astro-ph.CO]. [OpenAIRE]

3. S. T. McWilliams, J. P. Ostriker, F. Pretorius, Gravitational waves and stalled satellites from massive galaxy mergers at z <= 1. Astrophys. J. 789, 156 (2014), arXiv:1211.5377 [astro-ph.CO].

4. E. A. Huerta, S. T. McWilliams, J. R. Gair, S. R. Taylor, Detection of eccentric supermassive black hole binaries with pulsar timing arrays: Signalto-noise ratio calculations, Phys. Rev. D 92, 063010 (2015), arXiv:1504.00928 [gr-qc]. [OpenAIRE]

5. L. Sampson, N. J. Cornish, S. T. McWilliams, Constraining the solution to the last parsec problem with pulsar timing. Phys. Rev. D 91, 084055 (2015), arXiv:1503.02662 [gr-qc].

6. Z. Arzoumanian et al., The NANOGrav Nine-year Data Set: Limits on the Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background, arXiv:1508.03024 [astro-ph.GA].

7. X. Siemens, J. Ellis, F. Jenet, J. D. Romano, The stochastic background: scaling laws and time to detection for pulsar timing arrays, Classical Quant. Grav. 30, 224015 (2013), arXiv:1305.3196 [astro-ph.IM]. [OpenAIRE]

8. S. R. Taylor, M. Vallisneri, J. A. Ellis, C. M. F. Mingarelli, T. J. W. Lazio, R. van Haasteren, Are we there yet? Time to detection of nanohertz gravitational waves based on pulsar-timing array limits, arXiv:1511.05564 [astro-ph.IM]

Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue