publication . Preprint . 2011

Confounding of three binary-variables counterfactual model

Liu, Jingwei; Hu, Shuang;
Open Access English
  • Published: 06 Aug 2011
Abstract
Confounding of three binary-variables counterfactual model is discussed in this paper. According to the effect between the control variable and the covariate variable, we investigate three counterfactual models: the control variable is independent of the covariate variable, the control variable has the effect on the covariate variable and the covariate variable affects the control variable. Using the ancillary information based on conditional independence hypotheses, the sufficient conditions to determine whether the covariate variable is an irrelevant factor or a confounder in each counterfactual model are obtained.
Subjects
free text keywords: Statistics - Applications
Related Organizations
Download from
17 references, page 1 of 2

[1] D.G. Kleinbaum, L.L. Kupper and H. Morgenstern, Epidemiologic Research: Principle and Quantitative Methods. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold (1982).

[2] K.J.Rothman, Modern Epidemiology.Boston: Little, Brown (1986).

[3] S. Greenland, J.M. Robins and J. Pearl, Confounding and collapsibility in causal inference. Statistical Science, 14, 29-46 (1999).

[4] Z.G. Zheng, Y.Y. Zhang and X.W. Tong, Identifiability of Causal Effect for a Simple Causal Model. Science in China 45(3), 335-341 (2002).

[5] Z. Geng, Y.B. He and X.L. Wang, Relationship of causal effects in a causal chain and related inference. Science in China Ser. A Mathematics, 47(5), 730-740 (2004).

[6] X.H. Xie and Z. Geng, A Recursive Method for Structural Learning of Directed Acyclic Graphs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 459-483 (2008).

[7] Z. Geng, J.H. Guo and W.K. Fung, Criteria for confounders in epidemiological studies. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 64, Part1, 3-15 (2002).

[8] Y. Liang and Z.G. Zheng, The Identifiability Condition of Causal Effect for a Simple Causal Model. Acta Mathematica Scientia, 14, 29-46 (2003).

[9] D.B. Rubin, Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and non randomized studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 66, 688-701 (1974).

[10] P.W. Holland, Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American. Statistical Association, 81, 945-970 (1986).

[11] P.J. Wickramaratne and T.R. Holford, Confounding in epidemiologic studies: the Adequacy of the control groups as a measure of confounding. Biometrics, 43, 751-765 (1987).

[12] P.W. Holland, Reader reactions: Confounding in epidemiologic studies. Biometrics, 45, 1310-1316 (1989).

[13] O.S. Miettinen, Standardization of risk ratios. American Journal of Epidemiology, 96, 383-388 (1972).

[14] Z. Geng, X.L. Wang and Y.B. He, Conditions for confounding of Causal Diagrams. Chin. J. Epidemiol, 23, 77-78 (2002).

[15] G. Wunsch, Confounding and control. Demographic Research, 16(4), 97-120 (2007). [OpenAIRE]

17 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue