publication . Conference object . Preprint . 2018

Game Theoretic Analysis of Road User Safety Scenarios Involving Autonomous Vehicles

Umberto Michieli; Leonardo Badia;
Open Access
  • Published: 06 Mar 2018
  • Publisher: IEEE
Comment: Accepted at 'IEEE International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications' 9-12 September 2018 - Bologna, Italy. Special Session on 'Wireless Technologies for Connected and Autonomous Vehicles'. 7 pages, 5 figures
Persistent Identifiers
ACM Computing Classification System: ComputerApplications_COMPUTERSINOTHERSYSTEMS
free text keywords: Computer Science - Computer Science and Game Theory, Computer Science - Logic in Computer Science, Game theory, Pedestrian, Transport engineering, Theoretical models, Strategic interaction, Usability, business.industry, business, Game theoretic, Computer science, Road user
31 references, page 1 of 3

[1] M. Campbell, M. Egerstedt, J. P. How, and R. M. Murray, “Autonomous driving in urban environments: approaches, lessons and challenges,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 368, no. 1928, pp. 4649-4672, 2010.

[2] J. Gartner, “Gartner's 2016 Hype Cycle for Emerging Technologies,” August 2016.

[3] European Commission, “Annual Accident Report 2016,” European Road Safety Observatory, 2016.

[4] A. Hussein, F. García, J. M. Armingol, and C. Olaverri-Monreal, “P2V and V2P Communication for Pedestrian Warning on the basis of Autonomous Vehicles,” in Proc. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), pp. 2034-2039, IEEE, 2016.

[5] D. Milakis, B. Van Arem, and B. Van Wee, “Policy and society related implications of automated driving: A review of literature and directions for future research,” Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 1-25, 2017.

[6] A. Millard-Ball, “Pedestrians, Autonomous Vehicles, and Cities,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, 2016.

[7] K. Hurley, “How Pedestrians Will Defeat Autonomous Vehicles,” Scientific American, March 21, 2017.

[8] A. LaFrance, “Will Pedestrians Be Able to Tell What a Driverless Car Is About to Do?,” The Atlantic, 30 August, 2016.

[9] T. Bjørnskau, “The Zebra Crossing Game-Using game theory to explain a discrepancy between road user behaviour and traffic rules,” Safety science, vol. 92, pp. 298-301, 2017. [OpenAIRE]

[10] M. J. Osborne and A. Rubinstein, A course in game theory. MIT press, 1994.

[11] T. Bjørnskau, Game Theory, Road Traffic and Accidents: a Theory of User Interaction. No. TOI-287-1994, 1994.

[12] R. Elvik, “A review of game-theoretic models of road user behaviour,” Accident Analysis & Prevention, vol. 62, pp. 388-396, 2014. [OpenAIRE]

[13] P. Chen, C. Wu, and S. Zhu, “Interaction between vehicles and pedestrians at uncontrolled mid-block crosswalks,” Safety science, vol. 82, pp. 68-76, 2016.

[14] A. Rane, S. Krishnan, and S. Waman, “Conflict resolution of autonomous cars using game theory and cellular automata,” in Optimization, Reliabilty, and Information Technology (ICROIT), 2014 International Conference on, pp. 326-330, IEEE, 2014.

[15] H. Rewald and O. Stursberg, “Cooperation of autonomous vehicles using a hierarchy of auction-based and model-predictive control,” in Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 2016 IEEE, pp. 1078-1084, IEEE, 2016.

31 references, page 1 of 3
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue