On Aerts' overlooked solution to the EPR paradox

Preprint English OPEN
de Bianchi, Massimiliano Sassoli;

The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen (EPR) paradox was enunciated in 1935 and since then it has made a lot of ink flow. Being a subtle result, it has also been largely misunderstood. Indeed, if questioned about its solution, many physicists will still affirm today that the parad... View more
  • References (52)
    52 references, page 1 of 6

    Electronic address: msassoli@vub.ac.be 1 A. Einstein, B. Podolsky and N. Rosen, \Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality

    be considered complete?," Phys. Rev. 47, 777{780 (1935). 2 C. A. Hooker, \Concerning Einstein's, Podolsky's, and Rosen's Objection to Quantum Theory,"

    Am. J. Phys. 38, 851{857 (1970). 3 D. L. Reisler, \The Epistemological Basis of Einstein's, Podolsky's, and Rosen's Objection to

    Quantum Theory," Am. J. Phys. 39, 821{831 (1971). 4 H. Erlichson, \Bohr and the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Paradox," Am. J. Phys. 40, 634{636

    (1972). 5 H. Paul, \EinsteinPodolskyRosen paradox and reality of individual physical properties," Am.

    J. Phys. 53, 318{319 (1985). 6 R. B. Gri ths, \Correlations in separated quantum systems: A consistent history analysis of

    the EPR problem," Am. J. Phys. 55, 11{17 (1987). 7 G. Blaylock, \The EPR paradox, Bell's inequality, and the question of locality," Am. J. Phys.

    78, 111{120 (2010). 8 A. Aspect, P. Grangier and G. Roger, \Experimental Realization of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-

    Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities," Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 91

    (1982). 9 A. Aspect, \Bell's inequality test: more ideal than ever," Nature (London) 398, 189{190 (1999). 10 B. Hensen et al, \Loophole-free Bell inequality violation using electron spins separated by 1.3

  • Similar Research Results (2)
  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark