publication . Conference object . Preprint . 2004

EPR and Bell Locality

Travis Norsen;
Open Access
  • Published: 16 Aug 2004 Journal: AIP Conference Proceedings (issn: 0094-243X, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: AIP
Abstract
Comment: Submitted to Found. Phys
Persistent Identifiers
Subjects
arXiv: Physics::History of Physics
free text keywords: Quantum Physics, Physics - History and Philosophy of Physics, Bell state, Bell's theorem, Kochen–Specker theorem, EPR paradox, symbols.namesake, symbols, Principle of locality, Theoretical physics, Mathematics, Local hidden variable theory, Bell test experiments, Superdeterminism
Related Organizations
20 references, page 1 of 2

[1] John S. Bell, Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics, 2nd ed., Cambridge University Press, 2004.

[2] Eugene P. Wigner, “Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, 1976, reprinted in “Quantum Theory and Measurement”, John A. Wheeler and Wojciech H. Zurek, editors, Princeton University Press, 1983.

[3] N. David Mermin, “Hidden Variables and the Two Theorems of John Bell”, Rev. Mod. Phys., 65, No. 3, July 1993, pp. 803-815.

[4] Albert Einstein, “Reply to Criticisms” in “Albert Einstein: Philosopher Scientist”, P.A. Schilpp, ed., Harper and Row, 1959, pg 681.

[5] Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev. 47, pp. 777-80 (1935). Also reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek, op cit. [OpenAIRE]

[6] Niels Bohr, “Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?”, Phys. Rev. 48, pp. 696-702; reprinted in Wheeler and Zurek, op cit. (Emphasis in original)

[7] David Bohm, “Quantum Theory”, Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1951, pages 611-23.

[8] Travis Norsen, “Einstein's Boxes”, Am. J. Phys. 73 (2), February 2005, pp. 164-176.

[9] Abner Shimony, “Our Worldview and Microphysics” in “Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory”, James T. Cushing and Ernan McMullin, editors, University of Notre Dame Press, 1989

[10] Jon Jarrett, “On the Physical Significance of the Locality Conditions in the Bell Arguments”, Nous, 18, pp. 569-89 (1984) [OpenAIRE]

[11] Tim Maudlin, Quantum Non-Locality and Relativity, 2nd ed., Blackwell Publishing, 2002, Chapter 4.

[12] Arthur Fine, “Do correlations need to be explained?”, in Philosophical Consequences of Quantum Theory, edited by J. Cushing and E. McMullin (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, 1989), pp. 175-194; see also Arthur Fine, “The Shaky Game”, University of Chicago Press, 1996, pp. 59-63.

[13] Goldstein's article on Bohmian Mechanics at the Stanford Internet Encyclopedia (http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qm-bohm)

[14] D. Du¨rr, S. Goldstein, and N. Zanghi, “Quantum Equilibrium and the Role of Operators as Observables in Quantum Theory”, Journal of Statistical Physics, 116, pp. 959-1055 (2004), quant-ph/0308038

[15] F. Laudisa, “The EPR Argument in a Relational Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics”, Foundations of Physics Letters, 14 (2), pp. 119-132 (2001).

20 references, page 1 of 2
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue