Is the EPR paradox really a paradox?

Preprint English OPEN
Tartaglia, A.;
(1998)

The EPR paradox and the meaning of the Bell inequality are discussed. It is shown that considering the quantum objects as carrying with them ''instruction kits'' telling them what to do when meeting a measurement apparatus any paradox disappears. In this view the quantu... View more
  • References (10)

    [1] Einstein A, Podolsky B and Rosen N 1935 Phys. Rev. 47 777

    [2] Bell J S 1964 Physics 1 195

    [3] Bohm D 1951 Quantum Theory (New York: Prentice Hall)

    [4] Aspect A, Grangier P and Roger G 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett., 49 91; Aspect A, Dalibard G and Roger G 1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1804

    [5] Bohr N 1935 Phys. Rev. 48 696

    [6] Accardi L 1984 The probabilistic roots of the quantum mechanical paradoxes in The wave-particle dualism ed S Diner et al (Reidel Publishing Company) p. 297-330

    [7] Accardi L 1982 Foundations of quantum probability in Rend. Sem. Mat. Univ. Polit. Torino ( Torino: Levrotto & Bella) p. 249-270

    [8] Accardi L 1997 Urne e camaleonti (Milano: Il Saggiatore)

    [9] Stapp H P 1975 Nuovo Cimento B 29 270

    [10] Peres A 1993 Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers) p.

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark