On the problem of completeness of QM: von Neumann against Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen

Preprint English OPEN
Khrennikov, Andrei;
(2008)
  • Subject:
    arxiv: Physics::History of Physics | Quantum Physics

We performed a comparative analysis of the arguments of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen -- EPR, 1935 (against the completeness of QM) and the theoretical formalism of QM (due to von Neumann, 1932). We found that the EPR considerations do not match at all with the von Neuma... View more
  • References (21)
    21 references, page 1 of 3

    [1] A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen, Phys. Rev. 47, 777-780 (1935).

    [2] J. von Neumann, Matematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Springer, Berlin, 1932.

    [3] A. Yu. Khrennikov, V¨axjo¨ interpretation of quantum mechanics, in Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, Ser. Math. Modeling, 2, V¨axjo¨ Univ. Press, 2002, p.163-170, 2002http://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0202107

    [4] A. Yu. Khrennikov (editor), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations, Ser. Math. Modeling, 2, V¨axjo¨ Univ. Press, 2002.

    [5] A. Yu. Khrennikov (editor), Foundations of Probability and Physics-2, Ser. Math. Modeling, 5, V¨axjo¨ Univ. Press, 2003.

    [6] ] A. Yu. Khrennikov (editor), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations-2, Ser. Math. Modeling, 10, V¨axjo¨ Univ. Press, 2004.

    [7] L. E. Ballentine, Rev. Mod. Phys., 42, 358-381 (1970).

    [8] L. E. Ballentine, Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development, WSP, Singapore, 2003.

    [9] M. Kupsczynski, Seventy years of the EPR-paradox. Albert Einstein Century Conference, eds., J. M. Alimi and A. Fuzfa, Melville,New York,AIP,2006, 750, pp.516-523.

    [10] A. Khrennikov, The role of von Neumann and Lders postulates in the EPR-Bohm-Bell considerations: Did EPR make a mistake? http://arxiv.org/abs/0801.0419

  • Metrics
Share - Bookmark