publication . Article . Preprint . 2011

Mathematics turned inside out: the intensive faculty versus the extensive faculty

Grcar, Joseph F.;
Open Access
  • Published: 02 Jan 2011 Journal: Higher Education, volume 61, pages 693-720 (issn: 0018-1560, eissn: 1573-174X, Copyright policy)
  • Publisher: Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Abstract
Comment: 27 pages, 8 figures, 4 tables
Subjects
ACM Computing Classification System: MathematicsofComputing_GENERALComputingMilieux_COMPUTERSANDEDUCATION
free text keywords: Education, Core-Plus Mathematics Project, Reform mathematics, Everyday Mathematics, Areas of mathematics, Connected Mathematics, Interactive Mathematics Program, Math wars, Sociology, Mathematics education, Mathematics, Pedagogy, Philosophy of mathematics education, Mathematics - History and Overview, primary 00A06, secondary 97A40, 97B40
55 references, page 1 of 4

Amer. Math. Soc. Annual Survey of the Mathematical Sciences. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, 2009. http://www.ams.org/employment/surveyreports.html.

Amer. Math. Soc. 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. 2010. http://www.ams.org/msc/.

American Institute of Physics. Scitation. http://scitation.aip.org, 2009.

Auburn University. Student Credit Hours and Weighted Credit Hours Fall 2008. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment, Auburn, 2010. https://oira.auburn.edu/factbook/acadinfo/credithrs/credithrsfall2008.aspx.

M. J. Bates. The invisible substrate of information science. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 50(1):1043-1050, 1999.

D. M. Bressoud. Is the sky still falling? Notices of the AMS, 56(1):20-25, 2009.

C. Calhoun. The specificity of American higher education. In R. Kalleberg, F. Engelstad, G. Brochmann, A. Leira, and L. Mjøset, editors, Comparative Perspectives on Universities, pages 47-82. JAI Press, Stamford, 2000. [OpenAIRE]

Carnegie Foundation. Carnegie classifications data file. http://classifications. carnegiefoundation.org/downloads/public_file/cc2005_public_file_021110.xls, February 2010.

W. Clark. Academic Charisma and the Origins of the Research University. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 2006.

J. Confrey. Tracing the Evolution of Mathematics Content Standards in the United States: Looking Back and Projecting Forward towards National Standards. In K-12 Mathematics: What Should Students Learn and When Should They Learn it?, pages 11-39. February 2007. http: //www.mathcurriculumcenter.org/conferences/standards/K12proceedings.pdf.

D. T. Conley, editor. Understanding University Success: A report from Standards for Success, A project of the Association of American Universities and The Pew Charitable Trusts. Center for Educational Policy Research, University of Oregon, Eugene, 2003. http://www.epiconline.org/files/pdf/UUS_Complete.pdf.

G. W. Dunnington. Carl Friedrich Gauss: Titan of Science. The Math. Assoc. Amer., Washington. First edition, 1955, 2004.

R. Durrett. VIGRE Turns Three. Notices of the American Mathematical Society, 49(10): 1237-1243, 2002.

G. Fairweather and B. Wegner. Mathematics Subject Classification 2010. Notices of the AMS, 56 (7):848, 2009.

J. Ferrini-Mundy and K. J. Graham. The Education of Mathematics Teachers in the United States after World War II: Goals, Programs, and Practices. In G. M. A. Stanic and J. Kilpatrick, editors, A History of School Mathematics, vol. 2, pages 1193-1310. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Reston, 2003.

55 references, page 1 of 4
Powered by OpenAIRE Open Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue
publication . Article . Preprint . 2011

Mathematics turned inside out: the intensive faculty versus the extensive faculty

Grcar, Joseph F.;