You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
You have already added 0 works in your ORCID record related to the merged Research product.
Periferni gradski tekst. Ulično nazivlje i spomenici zagrebačke Dubrave u semiotičkoj perspektivi
Copyright policy )Croatian Ethnological Society and Department of Ethnology and Cultural Anthropology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of ZagrebPeriferni gradski tekst. Ulično nazivlje i spomenici zagrebačke Dubrave u semiotičkoj perspektivi
In a semiotic sense, the city-text is a symbolic structure with complex social and communicative functions and codes that enable communication between the sender and the recipient of the message, i.e. between the public and its cultural tradition. The textual interpretation of all street names and monuments in a certain area is based on the common characteristics of the city and the written text: these are symbolic entities with fixed, i.e. objectified meanings; they represent the contexts in which they originated, and they are subject to different interpretations. This article explores the ways in which ideology is interwoven into the spatial-symbolic landscapes of the city. The city's periphery, in this case Dubrava – which has a special axiological-symbolic organization – forms an opposition with the city centre (as the "most visible space").
Gradski tekst, shvaćen semiotički, jest znakovna struktura sa složenim socijalno-komunikativnim funkcijama i kodovima koji omogućuju komunikaciju između pošiljatelja i primatelja poruke, odnosno između javnosti i njezine kulturne tradicije. Tekstualno tumačenje ukupnosti imena ulica i spomenika zasniva se na zajedničkim karakteristikama grada i pisanoga teksta: to su znakovne cjeline u kojima se fiksiraju odnosno objektiviraju značenja, oni reprezentiraju kontekste u kojima su nastali te su podložni različitim interpretacijama. U ovom se članku istražuju načini na koje ideologija prožima prostorno-simboličke krajolike grada. Pritom se središtu grada (kao "najvidljivijemu prostoru") suprotstavlja gradska periferija, u ovom slučaju zagrebačka Dubrava, koja ima osobitu aksiološko-simboličku organizaciju.
gradski tekst; urbana toponimija; imena ulica; spomenici; zagrebačka Dubrava, city-text; urban toponymy; street names; monuments; Dubrava (Zagreb)
gradski tekst; urbana toponimija; imena ulica; spomenici; zagrebačka Dubrava, city-text; urban toponymy; street names; monuments; Dubrava (Zagreb)
92110
Slika 6. Ulice imenovane 2001. - 2016. koje komemoriraju Domovinski rat. Izvor: Službeni glasnik Grada Zagreba 2001. -
2016.; Zg Geoportal; izradila: Ivana Crljenko, 2017. godine
Alderman, Derek. 2000. “A Street Fit for a King. Naming Places and Commemoration in the American South”. Professional Geographer 52/4: 672-684. [https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00256]
Alderman, Derek. 2002. “Street Names as Memorial Arenas. The Reputational Politics of Commemorating Martin Luther King Jr. in a Georgia County”. Historical Geography 30: 99-120.
Alderman, Derek. 2003. “Street Names and the Scaling of Memory. The Politics of Commemorating Martin Luther King, Jr. within the African American Community”3.5A/r2e:a 163-173. [https://doi.org/10.1111/1475- 4762.00250]
Alderman, Derek. 2010. “Surrogation and the Politics of Remembering Slavery in Savannah, Georg-ia (USA)”. Jour nal of Historical Geography 36/1: 90-101. [https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhg.2009.08.001]
Aristotel. 1989. Retori.kZaagreb: Naprijed.
Atkinson, David i Denis Cosgrove. 1998. “Urban Rhetoric and Embodied Identities. City, Nation and Empire at the Viotrio Emanuele II Monument in Rome, 1870-1945”. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 88: 28-49.
Azaryahu, Maoz. 1996. “The Power of Commemorative Street Names”. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 14/3: 311-330. [https://doi.org/10.1068/d140311] [OpenAIRE]
Azaryahu, Maoz. 1997. “German Reunification and the Politics of Street Names. The Case of East Berlin”. Political Geography 16/6: 479-493. [https://doi.org/10.1016/S0962-6298(96)00053-4] [OpenAIRE]
In a semiotic sense, the city-text is a symbolic structure with complex social and communicative functions and codes that enable communication between the sender and the recipient of the message, i.e. between the public and its cultural tradition. The textual interpretation of all street names and monuments in a certain area is based on the common characteristics of the city and the written text: these are symbolic entities with fixed, i.e. objectified meanings; they represent the contexts in which they originated, and they are subject to different interpretations. This article explores the ways in which ideology is interwoven into the spatial-symbolic landscapes of the city. The city's periphery, in this case Dubrava – which has a special axiological-symbolic organization – forms an opposition with the city centre (as the "most visible space").
Gradski tekst, shvaćen semiotički, jest znakovna struktura sa složenim socijalno-komunikativnim funkcijama i kodovima koji omogućuju komunikaciju između pošiljatelja i primatelja poruke, odnosno između javnosti i njezine kulturne tradicije. Tekstualno tumačenje ukupnosti imena ulica i spomenika zasniva se na zajedničkim karakteristikama grada i pisanoga teksta: to su znakovne cjeline u kojima se fiksiraju odnosno objektiviraju značenja, oni reprezentiraju kontekste u kojima su nastali te su podložni različitim interpretacijama. U ovom se članku istražuju načini na koje ideologija prožima prostorno-simboličke krajolike grada. Pritom se središtu grada (kao "najvidljivijemu prostoru") suprotstavlja gradska periferija, u ovom slučaju zagrebačka Dubrava, koja ima osobitu aksiološko-simboličku organizaciju.