publication . Research . 2005

Revisión entre pares como instrumento de aprendizaje

Crespo García, Raquel; Villena Román, Julio;
Open Access Spanish; Castilian
  • Published: 01 Mar 2005
  • Country: Spain
Proyecto de Innovación Docente en las asignaturas de Organización de Contenidos Audiovisuales y e Inteligencia en Redes de Comunicaciones Este artículo describe la experiencia de innovación docente llevada a cabo este último curso basada en la aplicación de la metodología de revisión entre iguales como instrumento para el aprendizaje, desarrollada en las asignaturas Organización de Contenidos Audiovisuales (Ingeniería Técnica de Telecomunicación, especialidad Sonido e Imagen) durante el curso 2003-04 e Inteligencia en Redes de Comunicaciones (Ingeniería de Telecomunicación) durante el curso 2004-05. Los experimentos realizados muestran la utilidad de la metodolo...
free text keywords: Educación
Related Organizations
22 references, page 1 of 2

[1] K. Topping, “Peer Assessment Between Students in Colleges and Universities”, Review of Educational Research, vol. 68, no 3, pp. 249-276, Fall 1998.

[2] B. W. Ford, “The effects of peer editing/grading on the grammar-usage and themecomposition ability of college freshmen”, in Dissertation Abstracts International, 33, 6687, 1973.

[3] “Daedalus integrated writing environment”, The Daedalus Group, 2003. [Online]. Available:

[4] C: Helfers, S. Duerden, J. Garland, and D. L. Evans, “An effective peer revision method for engineering students in first-year English courses”, in Frontiers in Education Conference, November 1999, pp. 7-12.

[5] S. Nelson, “Teaching collaborative writing and peer review techniques to engineering and technology undergraduates”, in Frontiers in Education Conference, 1998, pp. 14- 18.

[6] “Calibrated peer review”, 2004. [Online]. Available:

[7] J. McGourty, P. Dominick and R. R. Reilly, “Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process”, in 1998 FIE Conference, 1998, pp. 14-18.

[8] J. McGourty,”Using multisource feedback in the classroom: A computer-based approach”, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 43, no.2, pp. 120-124, May 2000.

[9] E. Z.-F. Liu, S. Lin, C.-H. Chiu and S.-M. Yuan, “Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer”, IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 246- 251, August 2001.

[10] E. F. Gehringer, “Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review”, in Frontiers in Education Conference, October 2000.

[11] E. F. Gehringer, “Electronic peer review and peer grading in computer-science courses”, in Proc. Of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, 2001, pp. 139-143.

[12] A. Ward, J. Sitthiworachart and M. Joy, “Aspects of web-based peer assessment systems for teaching and learning computer programming”, in IASTED International Conference on Web-based Education, February 2004, pp. 292-297. [OpenAIRE]

[13] “Curso: Proyecto docente”, Plan de formación de profesorado curso 2001/2002, Gesem - Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, 2002.

[14] R. Lister, “Objectives and objective assessment in CS1”, in Proc. Of the Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, pp. 292-296, 2001.


22 references, page 1 of 2
Powered by OpenAIRE Research Graph
Any information missing or wrong?Report an Issue