Multimedia-Streaming in Benutzergruppen

Doctoral thesis OPEN
Kahmann, Verena;
(2008)
  • Subject: doctoral thesis
    • ddc: ddc:00 | ddc:0 | ddc:004

Mit Hilfe der IP-Technologie erbrachte Multimedia-Dienste wie IPTV oder Video-on-Demand sind zur Zeit ein gefragtes Thema. Technisch werden solche Dienste unter dem Begriff "Streaming" eingeordnet. Ein Server sendet Mediendaten kontinuierlich an Empfänger, welche die Da... View more
  • References (100)
    100 references, page 1 of 10

    1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 1.2 The Notion of Collaborative Media Streaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.3 Focus and Approach of this Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 1.4 Contribution of this Thesis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1.5 Outline . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

    3 Related Work 31 3.1 Group Streaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 3.1.1 Group Streaming using Multicast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 3.1.2 Peer-to-Peer Streaming . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 3.1.3 Integrated Content Distribution Networks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 3.2 Approaches for Session Sharing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2.1 Multimedia Middleware . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 3.2.2 Dynamic Addition of Clients . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 3.3 Collaborative Work Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3.1 Tele-Immersion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 3.3.2 Audiovisual Conferences . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40 3.3.3 Group Management in Streaming Architectures . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41 3.3.4 Conflict Resolution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.4 Discussion and Comparison with Our Approach . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.4.1 Characteristics of Related Approaches . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 3.4.2 Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45

    [1] A. Adams, J. Nicholas, and W. Siadak. Protocol Independent Multicast - Dense Mode (PIM-DM): Protocol Specification (Revised). RFC 3973, The Internet Engineering Task Force, January 2005.

    [2] Akamai Technologies, Inc. Akamai Media Delivery. http://www.akamai.com.

    [3] Apple Computer, Inc. Mac OS X Server QuickTime Streaming Server 5.5 Administration. http:// images.apple.com/server/pdfs/QT_Streaming_Server_v10.4.pdf, April 2005.

    [4] Apple Computer, Inc. QuickTime Overview. http://developer.apple.com/ documentation/QuickTime/RM/Fundamentals/QTOverview/QTOverview.pdf, August 2005.

    [5] A. Awe, J. Boston, M. Kim, B. Luken, E. So, P. Westerink, and S. Wood. IBM Toolkit for MPEG-4, version 1.3.0. http://www.alphaworks.ibm.com/tech/tk4mpeg4, December 2006.

    [6] H. Baldus, M. Baumeister, H. Eggenhuisen, A. Montvay, and W. Stut. WWICE: an architecture for in-home digital networks. In K. Nahrstedt and W. Feng, editors, Multimedia Computing and Networking 2000, pages 196-203, December 1999.

    [7] M. Barnes, C. Boulton, and O. Levin. A Framework for Centralized Conferencing. RFC 5239, The Internet Engineering Task Force XCON WG, June 2008. Internet Draft, Work in Progress.

    [8] Beaver - RTSP/RTP Proxy Implementation. Project Page, http://www.ibr.cs.tu-bs.de/ projects/beaver/, July 2006.

  • Metrics
    No metrics available
Share - Bookmark